HUD and PD&R Periodicals
 
My Cart   |  HUD Home  |  HUD USER Home
Search   Advanced Search
 
First time visitor
Contact Us
FAQ
 
 
Series of images depicting different types of housing.
An animated link to the Map gallery


Firstgov logo



The White House

 
Start of Main Content
space
Income Targeting of Housing Vouchers: What Happened After the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act?

Casey J. Dawkins

This article reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.


The Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act (QHWRA) of 1998 overhauled the nation’s approach to managing publicly owned housing and consolidated the Section 8 certificate and voucher programs into a new streamlined Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program. With the repeal of federal preferences for new admissions before QHWRA and the anticipated poverty deconcentration within public housing anticipated to occur following the adoption of QHWRA, new federal income-targeting requirements were established as part of QHWRA to ensure that the nation’s neediest families would continue to receive first priority in the allocation of tenant-based housing assistance. These requirements stated that no less than 75 percent of any local public housing agency’s (PHA’s) new admissions to the HCV Program in any given fiscal year must be families with extremely low incomes (ELIs) (income at or below 30 percent of the area median income).

This research examines data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administrative records for all households receiving housing choice vouchers from 1997 through 2005 to determine if the income-targeting goals of QHWRA are being met at the national and local levels. Analyses of the characteristics of new admissions between 1997 and 2005 reveal several important trends. First, while most PHAs were in compliance with the income-targeting goals of QHWRA during the 1997-through-2005 period, nearly 40 percent of PHAs still are not in compliance with the goals of QHWRA. On average, larger PHAs are more likely to comply with the goals of QHWRA than are small PHAs, although rural PHAs have made substantial strides in meeting the goals of QHWRA. Since the enactment of QHWRA, there has been a trend toward increased HCV participation among Hispanic households and a general trend toward smaller family sizes, older household heads, and fewer ELI female-headed households with children.

spacer

Content updated on 11/29/07   Back to Top Back to Top
 If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat Reader program already installed on your computer to view PDF files, CLICK HERE to download the free reader.
HUD logo HUD USER, P.O. Box 23268, Washington, DC 20026-3268
Toll Free: 1-800-245-2691 TDD: 1-800-927-7589
Local: 1-202-708-3178 Fax: 1-202-708-9981
Home Icon
HUD USER Home
Privacy Statement