2
 An Overview of Homeless Clients

History of Homelessness

For almost half (49 percent) of homeless clients, their current spell of homelessness is their first (table 2.7). Of the remaining homeless clients, 17 percent are in their second spell and 34 percent have had at least three homeless spells including the current one. Twenty-eight percent of current episodes have lasted three months or less, another 11 percent have lasted between four and six months, 15 percent between seven and twelve months, 16 percent between thirteen and twenty-four months, and 30 percent have lasted two years or more.

Patterns of homelessness differ between homeless clients in families and single clients, primarily among those who are in their first homeless episode (figure 2.15). Both groups are equally likely to be in a first episode (50 and 49 percent). However, homeless families are more likely than single homeless clients to be in a short first episode (34 versus 15 percent), and less likely to be in a long first episode (16 versus 34 percent).

Homeless clients give many different reasons why they had to leave their last residence, but only a few reasons are identified by at least 5 percent of clients. These include not being able to pay the rent (15 percent), losing a job or having a job end (14 percent), doing drugs (7 percent), the landlord making one leave (6 percent), and not getting along with the people there (5 percent). Reasons for leaving one's last residence differ greatly by family status. More homeless clients in families than single homeless clients left because they could not pay the rent (22 versus 14 percent), because there was violence in the household (13 versus 2 percent), or because the landlord made them leave (12 versus 5 percent). Conversely, fewer homeless clients in families than single homeless clients say they left because they lost their job (2 versus 16 percent).


Table 2.7
History of Homelessness and Transiency, by Family Status
  All Homeless Clients Clients in Homeless Families Single Homeless Clients
  (N=2938) (N=465) (N=2473)
Number of Times Homeless
One 49(%) 50(%) 49(%)
Two 17 27 15
Three or more 34 23 37
Length of Current Homeless Period
<3 months 28 49 23
4-6 months 11 11 11
7-12 months 15 16 15
13-24 months 16 11 17
25+ months 30 13 34
Pattern of Homelessness
First time homeless
6 months or less 18 34 15
more than 6 months 31 16 34
Not first time homeless      
current spell 6 months or less 21 26 20
current spell more than 6 months 30 25 31
Things Mentioned Most Frequently as Primary Reasons for Leaving Last Residence
Couldn't pay the rent 15 22 14
Lost job or job ended 14 2 16
Was doing drugs 7 4 7
Landlord made me leave 6 12 5
Didn't get along with the people there 5 3 5
Client or child abused/violence in household 4 13 2
When Homeless, Number of Towns/Cities Where Stayed 2 or More Days
1 (the location where they were interviewed) 56 71 54
2 22 16 23
3 8 10 8
4 3 2 3
5 to 10 6 1 6
11 or more 5 * 6
Clients Reporting a Move from One Community to Another While Homeless
  44 29 46
Among Movers, Where Living Now versus When First Became Homeless
In same state 61 74 59
In different state 37 26 39
In different country 1 0 2
Among movers, reasons left city/town where became homeless
No jobs available 18 10 19
Evicted/asked to leave housing 14 20 13
No affordable housing available 13 18 12
No services available 5 13 4
Among movers, reasons came to this city/town
Had friends/relatives here 25 29 24
Availability shelters/missions 21 41 18
Availability good services/programs 19 27 17
To look for work, heard were jobs 16 16 16

Source: Urban Institute analysis of weighted 1996 NSHAPC client data.
Note: Numbers do not sum to 100 percent due to rounding.
* Denotes percentage less than 0.5 percent but greater than 0.


People Who Change Locations after Becoming Homeless

Fifty-six percent of homeless clients were interviewed in the same city, town, or rural community where they became homeless this time; that is, they have not changed communities since becoming homeless (table 2.7). An additional 22 percent say they have stayed for at least two days in two different communities since becoming homeless (including the one where they were interviewed), 8 percent have stayed in three different communities, and 14 percent have stayed in four or more different communities since becoming homeless. Among movers, 61 percent moved from one community to another within the same state, with 74 percent of homeless families and 59 percent of single homeless clients who moved staying within the same state.

Family status makes a big difference in the likelihood of moving from one community to another while homeless. Homeless clients in families were much more likely to have remained in the same community than were single homeless clients (71 versus 54 percent). In addition, they were much less likely to have stayed in five or more communities while homeless (1 versus 12 percent).

Figure 2.15

Why They Move. Respondents who report having left the community where this episode of homelessness began explained why they left that place, and why they came to the city or town where they were interviewed for NSHAPC. Many reasons were given for leaving their original town. The four most common were that there were no jobs in that place (18 percent), there was no affordable housing in that place (13 percent), they were evicted or asked to leave their housing (14 percent), and there were no services in that place (5 percent). Clients in families were less likely than single homeless clients to give lack of jobs as a reason for leaving (10 versus 19 percent), and more likely to give as reasons the lack of affordable housing (18 versus 12 percent), eviction/being asked to leave (20 versus 13 percent), and perceived lack of services (13 versus 4 percent).

Homeless clients who moved also gave many reasons for coming to the city or town where they participated in NSHAPC. Only four reasons were given by 10 percent or more of movers: they had friends and/or relatives here (25 percent), shelters/missions were here (21 percent), they were looking for work or heard there were jobs here (16 percent), and there were good services and programs here (19 percent). Only the two service-related reasons differentiate families from single homeless clients. Forty-one percent of families who moved mentioned the availability of shelters or missions in their new location, compared with 18 percent of single homeless who moved, while 27 percent of families who moved mentioned good services or programs as a reason to come to their current location, compared with 17 percent of single homeless clients who moved.

Where They Move from and Where They Move to. The basic pattern of moves between community types is for people to move to a place that is larger than the one they came from.21 Among people who changed the type of community in which they were living after becoming homeless for their current episode, 28 percent started in a large central city, 14 percent in a medium-sized central city, 31 and 10 percent, respectively, in the urban fringes of large and medium-sized central cities, 10 percent in large or small towns, 5 percent in rural areas, and 1 percent in another country (table 2.8).


Table 2.8
Movers: Origins and Destinations
  Locations Where Client Became Homeless, This Episodea
  Large Central City (28%) Medium Central City (14%) Urban Fringe of Large Central City (31%) Urban Fringe of Medium Central City (10%) Large Town (3%) Small Town (7%) Rural (5%) Another Country (1%)
Moved Within Same Type of Place 66 49 50 27 0 0 1 0
Moved to Different Type of Place   51 50 73 100 100 99 100
What Type of Place Did They Move To?                
Large central city NA 40 34 25 44 22 27 Insufficient
Medium-sized central city 20 NA 14 47 55 38 60 N
Urban fringe of large central city 14 8 NA 1 * 41 3  
Urban fringe of medium-sized central city * 4 1 NA 1 0 10  
Large town, small town, or rural location 0 0 1 0 0 0 0  

Source: Urban Institute analysis of weighted 1996 NSHAPC Client data.
Note: Percentages do not sum to the proportion who moved to a different type of place due to rounding.
* Denotes values that are less than .5 percent but greater than 0. Unweighted N of movers with usable answers= 1357.
NA = Not Applicable.
a Percentage in parentheses are the proportion of movers who originated in each venue.



21The exception to this generalization is people who became homeless in a large central city. There is no category to represent any moves of these people to larger places, although the 66 percent of this group who moved to another large central city may well have been moving to a larger place.


Previous Contents Next


Homelessness: Programs and the People They ServeDecember 1999