 |
Details
| Title |
Community Acceptance of Affordable Housing |
| Highlights |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Neighborhood opposition to affordable housing development often results in regulatory restrictions.
|
| |
 |
The authors suggest using home equity assurance programs to reduce such opposition.
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
The authors suggest that locally required fiscal impact studies can be used to restrict affordable housing development.
|
| |
 |
The authors say that such studies can reduce opposition by showing that the development would have a positive impact.
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
The authors recognize that zoning regulations do not encourage affordable housing development.
|
| |
 |
Studies suggest inclusionary zoning programs, anti-snob zoning, and linkage programs as mechanisms to increase affordable housing.
|
 |
|
| Description |
Anti-growth sentiments and regulatory barriers to the availability and cost of housing increasingly affect all income groups in the nation. This articles reviews efforts by cities, states, and regional development groups to reduce opposition to affordable housing. The authors review a number of approaches to overcome NIMBYism and increase affordable housing production including better communication on future developments, better design and management of developments, less litigation, inclusionary zoning programs, anti-snob zoning, and linkage programs. They also highlight home equity assurance programs and fiscal impact studies in the report. |
| Publication Date |
2004 |
| Organization |
National Association of Realtors - National Center for Real Estate Research |
| Web Location | http://www.realtor.org/Research.nsf/files/koebellangfr.pdf/$FILE/koebellangfr.pdf |
Feedback: Please contact
us if you have a similar experience.
Notice: The contents of this record reflect
the views of the author and/or promulgating municipality, and should
not be construed as representing the views or policies of the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development or U.S. HUD's Office
of Policy Development and Research. No attempt has been made by
U.S. HUD or its contractors to verify the accuracy, currency, or
validity of the record contents presented herein.
|
|