| Highlights |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
California implicitly recognizes that application reviews for second-units can be burdensome. |
| |
 |
California requires that review of second-unit applications apply predictable, objective, and clear standards. |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
California implicitly recognizes that fees can limit the availability of second-units. |
| |
 |
California suggests fee deferrals and reduced impact fees to encourage second-units. |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Second-unit ordinances can have arbitrary, excessive, or burdensome regulations. |
| |
 |
California exempts second-units from any local growth controls. |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
California implicitly recognizes that zoning ordinances can limit the availability of second-units. |
| |
 |
California suggests flexible zoning requirements, reduced parking requirements, and setback reductions to encourage second-units. |
 |
|
| Description |
This memorandum, by Deputy Director Cathy Creswell, discusses AB 1866, which makes two changes to the code of California designed to encourage second-units. The first change, Section 65852.2, requires local governments with second-unit ordinances to consider all second-unit applications as of July 1, 2003. Also, governments without second-unit ordinances should consider second-unit applications as of January 1, 2003.
The legislature of California found that second-units are a good source of below-market-price housing for family members, students, elderly, and others. Also, the legislature found that homeowners receive extra income and an increased sense of security. California intends that the first change to the state code makes second-unit ordinances free from arbitrary, excessive, or burdensome regulations that restrict the ability to create second-units in authorized zones. Development applications for second-units should be considered without a discretionary review or hearing (ministerially). The process “must apply predictable, objective, fixed, quantifiable, and clear standards.” The state has also required that second-units be exempt from growth control measures. The memorandum suggests that localities monitor the effectiveness of regulations and programs that encourage second-units. To encourage second-units the state can apply flexible zoning requirements, reduce parking requirements and impact fees, and offer fee deferrals, setback reductions, and design prototypes. The memorandum also contains the new section of code, a list of other pertinent codes and regulations, and a list of resources on second-units.
The second change, Section 65583.1, allows identification of the capacity of second-units in fulfilling the locality’s housing need, as of January 1, 2003. The second change to California’s law is designed to change how local governments may count second-units towards housing requirements. Local governments “may count the realistic potential for new second-units within the planning period of the [housing] element.” The law also states that the housing element should calculate the anticipated affordability of second-units and outlines how they can be determined. The impact of development standards on constraining second-units should also be examined.
|