 |
Details
| Title |
Why We Have a Rehabilitation Code |
| Highlights |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
The building code, which is oriented towards new construction, can add unnecessarily to the time and expense of rehabilitating existing building. |
| |
 |
New Jersey developed provisions for existing buildings that were rational, predictable, and delivered safe and sound rehabilitated structures. |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
The building code, which is oriented towards new construction, can add unnecessarily to the time and expense of rehabilitating existing building. |
| |
 |
New Jersey developed provisions for existing buildings that were rational, predictable, and that delivered safe and sound rehabilitated structures. |
 |
|
| Description |
In this Website, New Jersey officials explain why they developed a building code specifically designed for rehabilitation of existing housing. According to the Website, “The building code, which is oriented towards new construction, can add unnecessarily to the time and expense of rehabilitating existing buildings because it was not written with existing buildings in mind. For new buildings, complying with the construction code is a straightforward process, but it is difficult to apply the code rationally and predictably to existing buildings. Because developers and building owners cannot predict with certainty what will be required to bring a deteriorated building back into use, projects that pose the greatest uncertainty in terms of time and resources are not attempted at all and the buildings remain unused. Thus, the challenge facing New Jersey was to develop provisions for existing buildings that were rational, predictable, and that delivered safe and sound rehabilitated structures." |
| Publication Date |
2002 |
| Organization |
New Jersey Department of Community AffairsDivision of Codes and Standards-Publications Unit |
| Web Location | http://www.state.nj.us/dca/codes/rehab/index.shtml |
Feedback: Please contact
us if you have a similar experience.
Notice: The contents of this record reflect
the views of the author and/or promulgating municipality, and should
not be construed as representing the views or policies of the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development or U.S. HUD's Office
of Policy Development and Research. No attempt has been made by
U.S. HUD or its contractors to verify the accuracy, currency, or
validity of the record contents presented herein.
|
|