 |
Regulatory Barriers Database
| Note: Many
records in our database contain more than one type of barrier and/or solution.
When searching within a particular category, we've purposely limited the
highlight (summary) results to only those which specifically relate to
your request. However, when you look for results based on more general,
non-category-specific searches, you'll often see multiple icons (and highlights)
displayed. |
Search Criteria
Topics: Fees and Dedications
Results: 392 Matches
1. Regulation and the Rise of Housing Prices in Greater Boston
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Massachusetts |
|
| |
Massachusetts |
Boston |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Existing land use regulations can restrict new construction and keep prices high. |
| |
|
|
|
2. Bay State Set to Reimburse Communities for Cost of Schooling Children That Move Into Designated Smart Growth Districts
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Massachusetts |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local communities may not have incentives to create higher-density smart growth districts and may charge impact fees. |
| |
|
|
|
3. Development Impact Fees: Best Practices Paper
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Arizona |
Maricopa County |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The authors of this article say that impact fees in some Maricopa County jurisdictions are going to have a negative effect on housing affordability.
|
| |
|
|
|
4. Overcoming Barriers to Housing Development in Massachusetts
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Massachusetts |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many Massachusetts municipalities feel that additional residential development will place an undue burden on local budgets. |
| |
|
|
|
5. City of Bend, Affordable Housing Task Force Report to the Community
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Oregon |
Bend |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bend, Oregon task force recognizes that development fees increase the cost of producing affordable housing.
|
| |
|
|
|
6. 2003 Legislative Changes to Oregon’s SDC Statutes
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Oregon |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The author observes that Oregon's impact fee statute may prevent use of impact fees to fund improvements because some infrastructure improvements are local upgrades as opposed to the development of new infrastructure. |
| |
|
|
|
7. Financing Infrastructure Improvements Through Impact Fees
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Maine |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was implicit recognition that some local governments did not understand how to enact and implement impact fee ordinances.
|
| |
|
|
|
8. Using Impact Fees to Finance Schools and Other Public Construction Occasioned by New Development
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
NATIONAL |
|
| |
Nebraska |
|
| |
Nebraska |
Lincoln |
| |
Nebraska |
Omaha |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The author acknowledges that impact fees can be a barrier to housing development, especially affordable housing. |
| |
|
|
|
9. Affordable Housing: Barriers and Solutions for Maine
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Maine |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maine has identified development and impact fees as practices that increase housing costs.
|
| |
|
|
|
10. Impact Fees - Bad Public Policy
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
North Carolina |
Rock Hill |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The authors list 15 arguments against impact fees.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Back to Top 
